Sat, 17 Apr 2021

Proposed development on protected wetlands raises community fears

Independent Australia
08 Mar 2021, 16:52 GMT+10

Opponents of a plan to build a town on internationally-recognised wetlands and a marine park are gearing up for the release of an environmental impact study (EIS) of the project.

The Queensland and Federal governments are conspiring to allow construction, with the State Government having signed an infrastructure agreement for the project and former Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg having rejected his Department's advice that the development is 'clearly unacceptable'.

The Redland City Council, which instigated the project, makes decisions about the project in secret and is fighting to hide relevant documents from its ratepayers.

In addition, public consultation has been 'flawed and deceptive', says community group Redlands2030.

The EIS, requested by Mr Frydenberg, is due to examine the Toondah Harbour Project, which plans a town the size of Innisfail off Cleveland's coast, east of Brisbane.

Government gives climate-wrecking Adani millions to 'attract investment'

The Queensland Government's avowed support for Adani's Carmichael mine doesn't measure up, Steve Bishop reports.

It has to show:

The equivalent across Australia would be to show how building a town in the waters of Coffin Bay or Wine Glass Bay or in Daintree Rainforest or Warrumbungles would result in an improvement to their environments.

Even the developer admits the project will have a 'significant impact' on nominated 'listed species' or a:

If it goes ahead, an exclusive town of 3,600 homes aimed at the "affluent" will stretch up to 800 metres out to sea on Ramsar wetlands, that the Federal Government has pledged to protect.

Outraged environmentalists have launched petitions demanding that the governments stop the destruction of habitat depended on by:

The project 'is not a market-led proposal', a company acting for the developers says:

Nor was it electorally driven. Karen Williams, the Mayor since April 2012 made no mention of wanting to develop Toondah Harbour in a detailed pitch before her election.

In May 2013 the Redland City Bulletin reported:

According to the story, it was the ferry terminal that was the development priority. There was no mention of residential development, merely a quote from mayor Williams who said:

The public was asked for development ideas in 2013. An undated State Government site carries answers to questions. There is no mention of housing in the bay.

However, traffic experts Cardno started preparing a report in July 2013 on the basis there would be 1,705 homes and a 'development core' jutting into the bay.

By January 2014, the project had become a residential and tourism hub and small print in a State Government document referred to 'higher density' housing on a 'pier/land reclamation area'.

But a Council survey regarding development at Toondah in February 2014 contained no reference to building out to sea.

Sussan Ley's approval of quarry development set to destroy koala habitat

Environment Minister Sussan Ley is defending her approval of a project set to increase the destruction of critical koala habitat.

Mayor Williams said the survey had "shown overwhelming support for development" at Toondah Harbour.

But this contradicted the survey which could only say:

In March 2014, Mayor Williams promised the environment would be a "major consideration" but buried four paragraphs from the end of a long announcement.

She said:

There was no mention of these units being on the wetlands.

A month later, the City Council released an artist's impression of the proposal with three huge blocks of units stretching out into the sea in a straight line.

A resident complained about the deception and secrecy:

Planning was undertaken by the Queensland Government and Redland Council and a final development scheme was approved on 29 May 2014 but it would be a further 18 months before these details were revealed to the public.

By September 2014 the number of homes had risen to 'about 1,000'.

In a submission to a Senate Select Committee Inquiry Chris Walker, Secretary of Redlands2030, said people had been 'duped' in the consultation process.

The Labor Queensland Government, which had opposed the priority development area (PDA) legislation while in Opposition, shocked many people on June 14 2015 when it 'formally endorsed' the project.

Opposition frontbencher Jackie Trad had told Parliament in 2012 the Opposition could not support elements of the legislation that was targeted at:

On November 25 2015, Redland City Council News announced the release of the master plan for Toondah Harbour with 'a range of residential options'. No numbers were given.

But in line with previous subterfuge, Redlands2030 discovered a business page on the Council website from the same day saying there would be:

Over three years, the project had transformed from improving a ferry terminal to building a new town in the protected bay, a process which had "outraged local residents and environmentalists", Redlands2030 told a parliamentary committee..

With an average of two people in each home it will be roughly the same size as Innisfail in Queensland, Forbes in NSW, Ararat in Victoria or Collie in WA.

Redlands2030 objected to the secrecy which had surrounded the project and in October 2017 launched a right to information request for access to agreements between the Council and Walker Corporation.

Weak environmental protection laws leave koalas stranded

The Great Koala National Park would save koalas threatened by logging in NSW because the State Government can't be trusted to protect them.

When the Council refused to release 589 of 680 relevant documents, the Assistant Information Commissioner decided there were no grounds for such a refusal.

She said:

And she pointed out:

But the secrecy continues, with an appeal yet to be finalised.

Council hid details of the project from its ratepayers on May 23 2018 when it agreed to the master plan, with the minutes recording:

The 2017 infrastructure agreement shows parts of the development overflowing the PDA area on page 63. It still applies but Walker Corporation submitted a new plan on June 5 2018, still with 3,600 homes in the bay.

Massive and prolonged opposition has tagged the project as highly undesirable real estate.

More than 22,000 people have signed a Change petition, Birdlife Australia has an online petition signed by more than 8,000 people, an e-petition to Parliament was signed by more than 6,000 people, a Redland City Bulletin poll was 'heavily against' the project.

There are several other petitions, including one of 1,136 people and in face-to-face questioning of 678 people by Redlands2030, 85 per cent opposed the plan.

Only eight of 1,419 submissions to the Federal Government did not oppose the project.

What is particularly telling is that in an 81-page analysis of 583 public submissions by Minister Seeney in May 2014 he failed to say how many objected to the project. Each petition counted as only one submission.

In last year's State Election, first-time independent Claire Richardson won more than a fifth of the 30,000 votes in Oodgeroo, which includes Toondah, by campaigning against building a town in the bay.

The State Government's support for the desecration of the bay goes against everything Labor has stood for in this regard.

Australia still falling behind in marine area protection

Studies have found reasons why having only a quarter of Australia's marine areas classified as fully protected is a problem.

It was a Queensland Labor Government that initiated both Moreton Bay Marine Park and the Ramsar listing with a commitment to protect the wetlands, and local MP Daryl Briskey reminding Parliament in 1990 of a previous fight to stop a canal estate at Toondah.

Briskey said:

Queensland Labor's platform states emphatically:

The issue reached the ALP National Platform in this resolution:

A recent claim is that the Toondah project could 'emulate and even surpass' development such as the Greenwich Peninsula in London, with its tower blocks of units, university, 20,000-seat entertainment arena, new offices and jobs.

The Redland City Bulletin portrayed the claim on as being a University College London report but in fact it came from a company called The Business of Cities.

It advises:

The study was commissioned by the Walker Corporation.

Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley and Queensland Deputy Premier and Development Minister Steven Miles refused to answer questions put to them by Independent Australia.

A spokesperson for Walker Corporation said:

He said the total cost would be $1.3 billion. An average sale price of $361,000 for the site of each home would provide the $1.3 billion. Every increase of $10,000 on that average price would result in a profit of $36 million to Walker Corporation.

Units at the nearby Toondah Outlook development are on sale at between $610,000 and $2,625,000.

Mayor Karen Williams said:

Redlands2030 has said:

Steve Bishop is a journalist and author. You can read more from Steve at stevebishop.net.

Related Articles

More Ohio News

Access More

Sign up for Ohio State News

a daily newsletter full of things to discuss over drinks.and the great thing is that it's on the house!